<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:58:42 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/"><rss:title>Mark MacEachern's Blog</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2012-02-16T19:58:42Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/15/study-design-filters.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/13/librarian-integration-in-a-four-year-medical-school-curricul.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/28/data-in-ehrs.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/health-science-librarianship-quiz.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/clinical-queries-are-effective.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/ipads-for-residents.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/kidney-transplantation-filter.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/rct-pt.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/31/top-reads-of-the-year.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/20/clifford-lynch-on-biomedical-libraries-in-the-next-decades.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/15/study-design-filters.html"><rss:title>Study Design Filters</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/15/study-design-filters.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-15T15:10:36Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Filters Library Research Searching</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn't exactly breaking news, but the <a href="http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/index.htm">Centre for Reviews and Dissemination</a> has compiled a nice collection of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/intertasc/">search filter references</a>. &nbsp;Not all are validated, but it's a valuable resource and worth a look when on a filter hunt. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>The group:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>is a collaborative venture to identify, assess and test search filters designed to retrieve research by study design or focus.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/intertasc/about.htm">The Search Filters Resource</a>&nbsp;aims to provide easy access to published and unpublished search filters. It also provides information and guidance on how to critically appraise search filters, study design filters in progress and information on the development and use of search filters. Inclusion of a search filter is not an endorsement of its validity or a recommendation.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/13/librarian-integration-in-a-four-year-medical-school-curricul.html"><rss:title>Librarian integration in a four-year medical school curriculum: a timeline</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/2/13/librarian-integration-in-a-four-year-medical-school-curricul.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-13T21:25:21Z</dc:date><dc:subject>EBM Evidence-based practice Instruction Library Medical Education</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I took lead on <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22289100%5Buid%5D&amp;cmd=DetailsSearch">the paper</a>, this represents the work of many over the years.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22289100%5Buid%5D&amp;cmd=DetailsSearch"><img src="http://www.markmaceachern.com/storage/MRSQ%20Paper.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1329168737546" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22289100%5Buid%5D&amp;cmd=DetailsSearch">paper in PubMed</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/28/data-in-ehrs.html"><rss:title>Data in EHRs</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/28/data-in-ehrs.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-28T12:39:23Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Comparative Effectiveness EHR Evidence-based practice Library MLA News</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparative effectiveness piece in the Jan MLA News is worth a read. &nbsp;In particular:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>As electronic health record systems begin to provide rich data sources for conducting CER [comparative effectiveness research] and the body of effectiveness research evidence grows, it is likely that evidence derived from CER will substantially supplement or even replace traditional RCTs as the main source of evidence for EBM guidelines and clinical decision support.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>EHRs are (or will be) great sources of data and it seems reasonable to expect that data to become the centrepiece of new evidence. &nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/health-science-librarianship-quiz.html"><rss:title>Health Science Librarianship Quiz</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/health-science-librarianship-quiz.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-27T03:50:26Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles Articles Health Sciences Librarianship Library</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From&nbsp;<a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051131">Trend Spotting - Whither Health Science Librarianship?</a>:</p>
<p>Quiz &ndash; Key dates in medical librarianship relating to automation&nbsp;</p>
<p>1. <span>When was the 1st edition of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) released for use in both indexing and cataloguing?</span></p>
<p><span>2. <span>In what decade did the demand for mediated online searches in the health sciences begin? 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s?</span></span></p>
<p>3. Modern machine methods were first applied to the production of <em>index Medicus</em>&nbsp;in the middle of which decade?</p>
<p>4. In what year did the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System (MEDLARS) become operational?</p>
<p>5. When was the 1st International MEDLARS Centre (to implement batch bibliographic retrieval services using NLM data) established?</p>
<p>6. When did the NLM initiate experiments in real time, interactive online access to the MEDLARS bibliographic database?</p>
<p>7. In what year did MEDLINE become operational?</p>
<p>8. <span>When did widespread searching of online commercial databases by academic reference librarians begin?</span></p>
<p>9. <span>When did services oriented to end users of online databases begin to appear?</span></p>
<p><span>10. <span>What was the real breakthrough in end-user searching in the mid-1980s?</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>11. <span>In what year did NLM develop the software package Grateful Med? (A personal computer-based search interface for health professionals who wanted to do their own searches)?</span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>12. <span>When did MEDLINE on CD-ROM first appear?</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span>13. <span>What was the major benefit of CD-ROM technology compared to online commercial databases?</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span><span>14. <span>When did the NLM release Internet Grateful Med?</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span><span><span>15. <span>When was access to MEDLINE over the Web made free of charge?</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p>Answers:</p>
<div class="para">
<p><span style="font-size: 80%;">1.&ensp;1960<br />2.&ensp;1960s<br />3.&ensp;Mid-1960s<br />4.&ensp;1964<br />5.&ensp;1966<br />6.&ensp;1970&ndash;1971<br />7.&ensp;1971<br />8.&ensp;late 1970s<br />9.&ensp;early 1980s<br />10.&ensp;the introduction of CD-ROM technology<br />11.&ensp;1986<br />12.&ensp;early 1987<br />13.&ensp;cost-effective, fixed annual cost rather than variable cost of online connect charges<br />14.&ensp;in 1996<br />15.&ensp;26 June 1997</span></p>
<p>&lt;thoughts&gt;</p>
<p>1. I need to brush up on the history of my profession.<br />2. I'm glad I missed the MEDLINE on CD-ROM generation.</p>
<p>&lt;/thoughts&gt;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/clinical-queries-are-effective.html"><rss:title>Clinical Queries Are Effective</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/26/clinical-queries-are-effective.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-27T02:49:49Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles Articles Clinical Queries PubMed</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>The use of the clinical queries filters is strongly&nbsp;recommended by proponents of evidence-based&nbsp;medicine and is often taught in courses for physicians about literature searching. Our results support the use of this PubMed filter.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The authors also point out that the filters were infrequently used by the sample. &nbsp;Unless you know they're there, they're difficult to stumble upon. &nbsp;Perhaps they can be integrated into the main search in some way. &nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.markmaceachern.com/storage/Clinical Queries are Effective.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327634190540" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;The abstract in <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249990">PubMed</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/ipads-for-residents.html"><rss:title>iPads for Residents</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/ipads-for-residents.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-16T17:30:05Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles Library MD Consult Mobile eBooks iPads</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://umhsheadlines.org/10/ipad-brings-mobility-and-portability-to-department-of-anesthesiology-functions/">perfect example</a> of how iPads can enhance the clinical workflow.&nbsp;</p>
<p>My role in the project was minimal. &nbsp;I discussed the E-Book market and specific title availability with the department's administration. &nbsp;We - the library - purchased MD Consult's anesthesiology collection. &nbsp;The department handled the rest.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<h1 class="entry-title"><span style="font-size: 50%;">Rethinking the Textbook</span></h1>
<p>The inspiration for this came from Dr. Theodore Sanford, professor and associate chair, Department of Anesthesiology, who noticed that residents were using textbooks less and less.</p>
<p>&ldquo;We used to provide residents a $3,000 allowance to select and buy textbooks, and discovered that not everyone spent the money,&rdquo; says Sanford. &ldquo;Then we moved to a model where we distributed a &lsquo;box of books,&rsquo; costing $1,500 each, but some were never opened.&rdquo;</p>
<p>With more textbooks becoming available electronically, Sanford started thinking about other options. Instead of spending thousands on the usual textbook reorder, &ldquo;why not use an iPad?&rdquo; he thought.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Full <a href="http://umhsheadlines.org/10/ipad-brings-mobility-and-portability-to-department-of-anesthesiology-functions/">story</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/kidney-transplantation-filter.html"><rss:title>Kidney Transplantation Filter</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/kidney-transplantation-filter.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-16T17:08:36Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles EMBASE Filters MEDLINE PubMed</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's the McMaster group's attempt to develop sensitive and specific Medline and Embase search filters for kidney transplantation. Rigorous methodology. &nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.markmaceachern.com/storage/KidneyTransplantationFilter.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326733861653" alt="" /></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/rct-pt.html"><rss:title>RCT [pt]</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2012/1/16/rct-pt.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-16T16:26:53Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles Articles Filters PubMed RCT</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a surprise, but <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22214757">this study</a> demonstrates that the randomized controlled trial publication type in PubMed is insensitive. &nbsp;Bottom line: Don't rely on it entirely. &nbsp;Use a validated filter whenever possible (like one from this <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=19712211">excellent paper</a>&nbsp;that compares and validates 38 RCT filters). &nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.markmaceachern.com/storage/RCTpt abstract.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326731526408" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/31/top-reads-of-the-year.html"><rss:title>Top Reads of the Year</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/31/top-reads-of-the-year.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-12-31T05:38:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Books Books Misc</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since I've somewhat made a tradition out of this, here are the 9 books I most enjoyed reading this year. &nbsp;I'll start 2012 by reading more Auster and Reed. &nbsp;</p>
<div id="wde77c80cf2c17a12202f6344fb8d9627"></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="UTF-8" src="http://www.librarything.com/widget_get.php?userid=mark&theID=wde77c80cf2c17a12202f6344fb8d9627"></script></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 80%;">Top: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140441298/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">Graphic &amp; Disturbing Euripides Plays</a> / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140049436/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">The Ivankiad</a> by Vladimir Voinovich /<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140097317/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20"> City of Glass (New York Trilogy)</a> by Paul Auster</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 80%;">Middle: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0945774109/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">War with the Newts</a> by Karel Capek / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226852180/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">Veeck as in Wreck</a> by Bill Veeck / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/193337277X/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">Hygiene and the Assassin</a> by Amelie Nothomb</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 80%;">Bottom: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0345465245/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">Lords of the Realm</a> by John Helyar / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1564782247/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">The Sisters Brothers</a> by Patrick deWitt / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1564782247/ref=nosim/librarythin08-20">The Terrible Threes</a> by Ishmael Reed</span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/20/clifford-lynch-on-biomedical-libraries-in-the-next-decades.html"><rss:title>Clifford Lynch on 'Biomedical Libraries in the Next Decades'</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.markmaceachern.com/blog/2011/12/20/clifford-lynch-on-biomedical-libraries-in-the-next-decades.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mark MacEachern</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-12-20T19:50:15Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Articles Data Mining Databases Library</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rethinking articles. &nbsp;Increasing computation and data mining efforts and capabilities. &nbsp;Linking genomics and patient data. &nbsp;Creating largescale, sharable databases of patient data and medical records. &nbsp;The ethics related to all of this. &nbsp;<a href="http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=10864">Worth a listen</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://videocast.nih.gov/embed.asp?file=17032" width="645" height="531" frameborder="0">browser does not support iframe</iframe></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>
