Google Scholar & Systematic Reviews
Friday, January 11, 2013 at 1:40PM I agree.
Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 9;13(1)
Jean-François G, Laetitia R, Stefan D.
PMID: 23302542
Articles,
Google,
Systematic Reviews in
Articles Information Seeking Behaviours of Residents
Saturday, December 29, 2012 at 11:10AM This JAMIA study looks at a) the types of questions residents are asked, and b) the sources they consult, if any, to answer them. Note: The range of questions is broad, so the focus isn't on questions/sources that generally concern us.
Bass EJ, Devoge JM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Borowitz SM. Resident physicians as human information systems: sources yet seekers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Dec 25. PMID: 23268485.
How Current Are Point of Care Resources?
Sunday, December 23, 2012 at 7:45AM I don't think it's reasonable to expect point of care resources to be 100% current all the time, but the number of outdated topic summaries in some is substantial:
Source: PMID 23220465
The authors suggest further research be done to improve updating efficiency, which makes me wonder what a reasonable expectation for currency is. A new study should be evaluated and considered w/i the context of current recommendations before it's added to one of these resources. How quickly can this be done? How much can the process be automated?
FWIW: Of the 4 in this study, Dynamed seems to balance update speed and quality the best.



